You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 4727 CRB-6-03-9
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
OCTOBER 8, 2003
SUZANNE THRELFALL
CLAIMANT-APPELLEE
v.
CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND
EMPLOYER
and
CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION TRUST
INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS
Respondents filed a Petition for Review from the trial commissioner’s September 15, 2003 Sec. 31-308a Order. That order was issued as a result of an informal hearing. No transcript or exhibits exist. Thus, there is no record for this board to properly consider this appeal under Sec. 31-301. The appeal is therefore remanded to the Commissioner acting for the Sixth District for a formal hearing or other appropriate action. See Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, 4721 CRB-1-03-9 (September 18, 2003); Carmody v. Waterbury, 4712 CRB-5-03-8 (September 16, 2003); Mack v. State/Department of Correction, 4589 CRB-1-02-11 (January 8, 2003); Fiamma v. Moliterno Stone Sales, 4465 CRB-1-01-12 (December 20, 2001).
John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Compensation Review Board
Workers’ Compensation Commission
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |