You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 4497 CRB-1-02-3
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
MARCH 13, 2002
ROBERT W. KENYON
CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v.
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP. ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION
EMPLOYER
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
The claimant, acting pro se, has filed a petition for review from the trial commissioner’s February 11, 2002 Ruling Re: Motion To Dismiss. In that ruling the trial commissioner granted respondent’s Motion To Dismiss claimant’s claim for benefits pursuant to Sec. 31-290a.
Section 31-290a states in pertinent part; “[a]ny party aggrieved by the decision of the commissioner may appeal the decision to the Appellate Court.” This board lacks jurisdiction over claimant’s appeal. Therefore, it must be dismissed. See, Rondini v. Tectonic Industries, 10 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 210, 1231 CRD-6-91-5 (Dec. 4, 1992); Morales v. Hydro Conduit Corp., 13 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 10, 2155 CRB-6-94-9 (Oct. 17, 1994); see also Erisoty v. Merrow Machine Co., 11 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 131, 1639 CRB-6-93-2 (June 25, 1993), aff’d, 34 Conn. App. 708 (1994), cert. denied, 231 Conn. 908 (1994).
John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Compensation Review Board
Workers’ Compensation Commission
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |