You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.



Mele v. City of Hartford

CASE NO. 4453 CRB-1-01-9

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

NOVEMBER 30, 2001

LYDIA MELE

CLAIMANT-APPELLEE

v.

CITY OF HARTFORD

EMPLOYER

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

ORDER

The Respondent-Employer has filed a Petition for Review from the trial commissioner’s September 21, 2001 Order pursuant to Sections 31-288 and 31-300. That order was issued as the result of an informal hearing. No transcript or exhibits exist. Absent a record this board cannot properly consider the appeal under Section 31-301. Consequently, this matter is not ripe for appellate review. Therefore, this matter is remanded to the First District for a formal hearing or other appropriate action. See, McCall v. State/University of Connecticut, 4451 CRB-2-01-10 (November 13, 2001); Quinn v. Dwan & Co., Inc., 4216 CRB-5-00-3 (May 24, 2000); Lirot v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming, 3400 CRB-2-96-8 (April 7, 1997); Muldoon v. New England Installation, 3415 CRB-4-96-8 (November 3, 1997).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission

 



   You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.