State of Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission, John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Home News RSS News QUICK Find Index Search E-Mail
General Information Glossary Law CRB Opinions Workers' Compensation Commission Downloadable Forms and Publications Links

Jencik v. Chief Automotive Systems

CASE NO. 3376 CRB 5-96-7

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

FEBRUARY 28, 1997

ALBERT JENCIK

CLAIMANT-APPELLEE

v.

CHIEF AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS

EMPLOYER

and

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

INSURER

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS

and

SECOND INJURY FUND

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE1

APPEARANCES:

The claimant was represented by Robert Cohen, Esq., Levy & Droney, P.C., 74 Batterson Park Road, Farmington, CT 06032.

The respondents were represented by Debra S. Dee, Esq., Law Offices of Nancy Rosenbaum, 655 Winding Brook Dr., P.O. Box 695, Glastonbury, CT 06033, who did not appear at oral argument.

The Second Injury Fund by Taka Iwashita, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, 55 Elm St., P.O. Box 120, Hartford, CT 06141-0120, who did not appear at oral argument.

This Petition for Review from the July 5, 1996 Finding and Award of the Commissioner acting for the Fifth District was heard February 28, 1997 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the Commission Chairman Jesse M. Frankl and Commissioners James J. Metro and Angelo L. dos Santos.

DISMISSAL

JESSE M. FRANKL, CHAIRMAN. The employer and its insurer (“respondents”) have filed a petition for review from the July 5, 1996 Finding and Award of the Commissioner acting for the Fifth District. The respondents have failed to file a brief and failed to appear at oral argument before this board. In addition, the respondents failed to file their reasons of appeal in a timely manner pursuant to § 31-301-2.

Accordingly, by a bench ruling the compensation review board dismissed the respondents’ appeal for failure to prosecute with proper diligence pursuant to Practice Book § 4184A. See Divita v. Thames Valley Steel, 12 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 50, 1541 CRB-2-92-10 (Jan. 26, 1994); Milardo v. Shuck Petroleum, 11 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 279, 1559 CRB-8-92-11 (Nov. 22, 1993); Hargatai v. Copy Data, Inc., 11 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 106, 107, 1475 CRB-4-92-7 (June 2, 1993).

The respondents’ appeal is dismissed.

Commissioners James J. Metro and Angelo L. dos Santos concur.

1 The Second Injury Fund had filed a petition for review, but subsequently withdrew its appeal. BACK TO TEXT

Workers’ Compensation Commission

Page last revised: June 13, 2005

Page URL: http://wcc.state.ct.us/crb/1997/3376crb.htm

Workers’ Compensation Commission Disclaimer, Privacy Policy and Website Accessibility

State of Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission, John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Home News RSS News QUICK Find Index Search E-Mail
General Information Glossary Law CRB Opinions Workers' Compensation Commission Downloadable Forms and Publications Links