You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.



Roaix v. Stop & Shop

CASE NO. 6224 CRB-5-17-10

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

OCTOBER 24, 2017

DAVID M. ROAIX

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

STOP & SHOP

EMPLOYER

SELF-INSURED

and

MAC RISK MANAGEMENT/AHOLD USA

ADMINISTRATOR

RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES

REMAND ORDER

The claimant filed a Petition for Review on October 2, 2017 from the trial commissioner’s September 22, 2017 ruling granting the Form 36 filed on August 25, 2017. The ruling was issued as the result of an informal hearing wherein it appears no record exists. Due process requires an evidentiary hearing where a record can be created. Absent a record, this board cannot properly consider an appeal pursuant to Sec. 31-301(a).

The matter is therefore remanded to the trial commissioner for a Formal Hearing or other appropriate action. See, Passalugo v. Guida-Seibert Dairy Company, 5796 CRB-6-12-11 (November 27, 2012), Chung v. TTM Technologies, Inc., 5675 CRB-2-11-8 (August 23, 2011).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission

 



   You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.