You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.



Britton v. Labcorp

CASE NO. 5454 CRB-4-09-4

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

APRIL 28, 2009

TAMEKA P. BRITTON

CLAIMANT-APPELLEE

v.

LABCORP

EMPLOYER

and

BROADSPIRE

INSURER

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS

ORDER

Respondent Broadspire filed a Petition for Review from a Sec. 31-288(b) penalty issued March 30, 2009. Respondent’s appeal is subsequent to an informal hearing and is therefore premature. No record exists. Absent a record this board cannot properly consider an appeal under Sec. 31-301. The matter is therefore remanded to the trial commissioner acting for the Fourth District for a Formal Hearing or other appropriate action. See Quinn v. Prime Technology, LLC, 5222 CRB-3-07-4 (May 14, 2007).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission

 



   You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.