DiBlase v. Logistec of Connecticut, Inc.

CASE NO. 5305 CRB-3-07-11

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

JANUARY 3, 2008

ANTHONY DiBLASE

CLAIMANT-APPELLEE

v.

LOGISTEC OF CONNECTICUT, INC.

EMPLOYER

and

LAMORTE BURNS & CO.

INSURER

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS

ORDER

Respondents-Appellants, Logistec of Connecticut, Inc., and Lamorte Burns & Company have filed a Petition for Review from the trial commissioner’s ruling of November 1, 2007 denying respondents’ Motion to Quash and for Protective Order. Said ruling was issued absent a hearing creating a record. No transcripts or exhibits exist. Consequently, this board cannot properly consider this appeal pursuant to Sec. 31-301(a). The matter is therefore remanded to the trial commissioner acting for the Third District for a formal hearing or other appropriate action. See Bosco v. James V. Bosco, DDS, 5184 CRB-3-07-1 (February 13, 2007).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission