Quinn v. Prime Technology, LLC, et al

CASE NO. 5222 CRB 3-07-4

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

MAY 14, 2007

SAMUEL QUINN

CLAIMANT-APPELLEE

v.

PRIME TECHNOLOGY, LLC, et al

EMPLOYER

and

BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS OF CONNECTICUT

INSURER

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

ORDER

Respondent, Berkley Administrators of Connecticut filed a Petition for Review April 23, 2007 from a Sec. 31-288 and Sec. 31-300 sanction issued April 16, 2007 by the Commissioner acting for the Sixth District. No record exists. Absent a record this board cannot properly consider an appeal under Sec. 31-301. The matter is therefore remanded to the trial commissioner acting for the Sixth District for a Formal Hearing or other appropriate action. See Chung v. Wal-Mart, 4474 CRB-2-02-1 (November 13, 2002); Murphy v. Highfield Country Club, 5117 CRB-5-05-7 (August 22, 2006).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission