Conerly v. IBM

CASE NO. 4567 CRB-7-02-9

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

NOVEMBER 7, 2002

DARRELL CONERLY

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

IBM

EMPLOYER

and

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

INSURER

RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES

ORDER

Claimant filed a timely Petition for Review from the trial commissioner’s August 27, 2002 Ruling On Respondent’s Motion To Dismiss. The ruling was issued without a formal hearing on the record. No transcript or exhibits exist. Absent a record, this board cannot properly consider this appeal pursuant to Sec. 31-301. The matter is therefore remanded to the commissioner acting for the Seventh District for a formal hearing on the record or other appropriate action. See McKim V. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc., 4565 CRB-1-02-9 (October 10, 2002); Rizor v. International Ice Cream Corp., 4206 CRB-1-00-3 (May 24, 2000); Lirot v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming, 3400 CRB-2-96-8 (April 7, 1997); Muldoon v. New England Installation, 3415 CRB 4-96-8 (November 3, 1997); Warchola v. U.S. Gypsum Specialists, 11 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 108, 1444 CRB-1-92-6 (June 2, 1993).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission