Woomer v. Home Depot

CASE NO. 4507 CRB-2-02-3

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

APRIL 25, 2002

CANDY WOOMER

CLAIMANT-APPELLEE

v.

HOME DEPOT

EMPLOYER

and

SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

INSURER

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS

ORDER

The respondents, Home Depot and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. have filed a Petition for Review from the trial commissioner’s March 11, 2002 Order. That order was issued as the result of an informal hearing. No transcript or exhibits exist. Thus, there is no record for this board to properly consider this appeal pursuant to Sec. 31-301. The matter is therefore remanded to the commissioner acting for the Second District for a formal hearing or other appropriate action. See Fiamma v. Moliterno Store Sales, 4465 CRB-1-01-12 (Dec. 20, 2001); Mele v. Hartford, 4453 CRB-1-01-9 (Nov. 30, 2001); McCall v. State/University of Connecticut, 4451 CRB-2-01-10 (Nov. 13, 2001); Quinn v. Dwan & Co., Inc., 4216 CRB-5-00-3 (May 24, 2000); Lirot v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming, 3400 CRB-2-96-8 (April 7, 1997); Warchola v. U.S. Gypsum Specialists, 11 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 108, 1444 CRB-1-92-6 (June 2, 1993).

John A. Mastropietro, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission