You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 3866 CRB-06-98-07
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
AUGUST 12, 1998
ROBERT CAFFERY
CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v.
CITY OF NEW BRITAIN
EMPLOYER
SELF-INSURED
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
The claimant filed a petition for review July 30, 1998 from the July 15, 1998 Finding and Award of Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Sixth District. He has also filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Appeal Finding and Award, in which he explains the reasons for his late appeal. Regardless of those reasons or the lack of a significant delay beyond the filing deadline, this board cannot grant the claimant’s motion. We do not have any discretion at all to accept a late appeal under § 31-301(a). The statute clearly circumscribes the subject matter jurisdiction of the Compensation Review Board to cases in which an appeal is filed within ten days of the date notice of the commissioner’s decision was sent. See Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Company, 49 Conn. App. 1, 3-4 (1998). Therefore, we must dismiss the claimant’s petition for review.
Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman
Compensation Review Board
Workers’ Compensation Commission
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |