You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 3562 CRB 04-97-03
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 30, 1998
MARY IACOBUCCI
CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v.
MARRIOTT CORPORATION
EMPLOYER
and
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
INSURER
RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
APPEARANCES:
The claimant was represented by Francis J. Ficarra, Esq., 1375 Kings Highway East, Fairfield, CT 06430, who did not appear at oral argument.
The respondents were represented by Christopher Goulden, Esq., Mihaly & Kascak, 925 White Plains Rd., Trumbull, CT 06611.
This Petition for Review from the March 7, 1997 Finding and Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Fourth District was heard November 21, 1997 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the Commission Chairman Jesse M. Frankl and Commissioners James J. Metro and John A. Mastropietro.
JESSE M. FRANKL, CHAIRMAN. The claimant has filed a petition for review from the March 7, 1997 Finding and Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Fourth District. The claimant has failed to file a motion to correct, reasons of appeal, or a brief and has failed to appear at oral argument before this board.
Accordingly, we dismiss the claimant’s appeal for failure to prosecute with proper diligence pursuant to Practice Book § 4184A. See Divita v. Thames Valley Steel, 12 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 50, 1541 CRB-2-92-10 (Jan. 26, 1994); Milardo v. Shuck Petroleum, 11 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 279, 1559 CRB-8-92-11 (Nov. 22, 1993); Hargatai v. Copy Data, Inc., 11 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 106, 107, 1475 CRB-4-92-7 (June 2, 1993).
The claimant’s appeal is dismissed.
Commissioners James J. Metro and John A. Mastropietro concur.
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |