You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.



Craft v. State of Connecticut/Department of Revenue Services

CASE NO. 3089 CRB-1-95-6

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

SEPTEMBER 3, 1996

BETTY CRAFT

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF CONNECTICUT/DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SERVICES

EMPLOYER

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

and

ALEXIS, INC.

SELF-INSURED ADMINISTRATOR

APPEARANCES:

The claimant was not represented at the hearing. Notice was sent to William Scaringe, Esq., P. O. Box 7969, 641 Farmington Avenue, West Hartford, CT 06107.

The respondent was represented by Michael J. Belzer, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, 55 Elm Street, P. O. Box 120, Hartford, CT 06141-0120.

This Motion to Stay Appeal Time Limitation from the June 13, 1995 Findings of Facts and Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the First District was heard April 19, 1996 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of Commissioners Robin L. Wilson, Nancy A. Brouillet and Michael S. Miles.

DISMISSAL ORDER

ROBIN L. WILSON, COMMISSIONER. The claimant has filed a Motion to Stay Appeal Time Limitation from the June 13, 1995 Findings of Facts and Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the First District. This motion was construed as a notice of appeal in accordance with the Chairman’s letter dated July 11, 1995. To date, the claimant has not filed documents in support of her appeal, including Reasons of Appeal or a brief of the issues. It is the appellant’s responsibility to provide this board with an adequate record for review once an appeal has been filed. See Sargent v. Rybczyk Plumbing, 13 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 128, 130, 1660 CRB-6-93-3 (January 31, 1995). Therefore, we must dismiss her appeal for failure to prosecute with proper diligence pursuant to Practice Book § 4055. See Esquillin v. Pinto Lavado Enterprises, 13 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 148, 1914 CRB-2-93-12 (Feb. 1, 1995); Burke v. Abacus Transfer & Storage, 13 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 19, 1782 CRB-3-93-7 (Nov. 3, 1994).

Commissioners Nancy A. Brouillet and Michael S. Miles concur.

 



   You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.