Beloski v. Selmix-Alco

CASE NO. 2275 CRB-5-95-1

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

JUNE 21, 1996

CONSTANCE BELOSKI

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

SELMIX-ALCO

EMPLOYER

and

LIBERTY MUTUAL INS. CO.

INSURER

RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES

APPEARANCES:

The claimant was not represented at oral argument. Notice sent to Mark Johnson, Esq., Sullivan, Reis, Sanchy & Logan, 9 Mason St., Torrington, CT 06790.

The respondents were represented by Scott W. Williams, Esq., Maher & Williams, 1300 Post Road, P. O. Box 550, Fairfield, CT 06430.

This Petition for Review from the January 12, 1995 Finding and Award of Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Fifth District was heard December 1, 1995 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the Commission Chairman Jesse M. Frankl and Commissioners Roberta Smith Tracy and Amado J. Vargas.

DISMISSAL ORDER

JESSE M. FRANKL, CHAIRMAN. The claimant has petitioned for review from the January 12, 1995 Finding and Award of Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Fifth District. To date, she has filed no documents in support of her appeal, including Reasons of Appeal, a Motion to Correct, or a brief, nor has she requested an extension of time to do so. Therefore, we must dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute with proper diligence pursuant to Practice Book § 4055. See Esquillin v. Pinto Lavado Enterprises, 13 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 148, 1914 CRB-2-93-12 (Feb. 1, 1995); Burke v. Abacus Transfer & Storage, 13 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 19, 1782 CRB-3-93-7 (Nov. 3, 1994).

Commissioners Roberta Smith Tracy and Amado J. Vargas concur.