You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.

Griffith-Patton v. State of Connecticut/Department of Agriculture

CASE NO. 1888 CRB-1-93-11

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

DECEMBER 15, 1995

EVA GRIFFITH-PATTON

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF CONNECTICUT/DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

EMPLOYER

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

and

SECOND INJURY FUND

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

DENIAL OF MOTION FOR ARTICULATION

JESSE M. FRANKL, CHAIRMAN. The pro se claimant has filed a Rebuttal to this board’s November 24, 1995 denial of her October 9, 1995 Motion for Rectification/ Articulation. As previously noted, we issued a Corrected Articulation on November 22, 1995 in response to her September 11, 1995 Motion for Rectification/Articulation. Again, nothing new has been added by the claimant’s latest motion that would affect our decision. Thus, for the second time, we decline to further articulate our decision.

Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission

 

   You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.