Griffith-Patton v. State of Connecticut/Department of Agriculture

CASE NO. 1888 CRB-1-93-11

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

NOVEMBER 24, 1995

EVA GRIFFITH-PATTON

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF CONNECTICUT/DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

EMPLOYER

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

and

SECOND INJURY FUND

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

DENIAL OF MOTION FOR ARTICULATION

The pro se claimant has filed a Motion for Rectification/Articulation dated October 9, 1995 in conjunction with her appeal to the State of Connecticut Appellate Court. The claimant previously filed a Motion for Rectification /Articulation dated September 11, 1995, in response to which we issued an articulation dated November 22, 1995. This board does not believe that the claimant has raised any meritorious concerns in her second motion, and thus denies the October 9, 1995 Motion for Rectification/ Articulation in its entirety.

Jesse M. Frankl, Chairman

Compensation Review Board

Workers’ Compensation Commission