CASE NO. 1467 CRB-1-92-7
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 4, 1993
ROBERT E. VASSEUR, JR.
KONICA BUSINESS MACHINES
CRAWFORD & COMPANY
Claimant filed a Petition for Review July 20, 1992 from the trial commissioner’s oral ruling granting respondent-employer’s Form 36.
Since there is no written or printed record of the proceedings before the trial commissioner and no Finding and Award, the Compensation Review Board cannot properly consider this appeal in accordance with Sec. 31-301 and Administrative Regulation Sec. 31-301-1. See e.g., Nevers v. Environmental Waste Removal, 10 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 96, 1166 CRD-5-91-1 (1992); Kempesta v. Hendels Gas & Oil Co., 9 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 152, 998 CRD-2-90-4 (1991); Palmer v. UTC/Pratt & Whitney, 9 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 150, 1079 CRD-8-90-7 (1991); Laime v. American Standard, 9 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 62, 914 CRD-2-89-9 (1991); Waddington v. Electric Boat/Division of General Dynamics, 8 Conn. Workers’ Comp. Rev. Op. 149, 720 CRD-2-88-4 (1990); Mauro v. Electric Boat Division, 713 CRD-2-88-3 (1989).
The appeal is therefore dismissed as there must be further proceedings below before an appeal will lie.
Jesse Frankl, Chairman
Compensation Review Board
Workers’ Compensation Commission