You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 1456 CRB-7-92-7
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
MAY 7, 1993
RALPH CASOLO
CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v.
FAIRFIELD ELECTRIC, INC.
EMPLOYER
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
Pursuant to the: April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, U.S., 113 S. Ct. 58O, L.Ed2d (1992) the Seventh District July 7, 1992 decision denying Sec. 31-284b benefits is hereby affirmed.
By the Compensation Review Board,
Jesse Frankl, Chairman
Presiding Commissioner for the Compensation Review Board Panel
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |