You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.



Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division Barnes Group Inc.

CASE NO. 1033 CRD-1-90-6

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD/DIVISION

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

MARCH 30, 1993

ANDREW SCHICK

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

WINDSOR AIRMOTIVE DIVISION BARNES GROUP INC.

EMPLOYER

and

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY

INSURER

RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES

DECISION ON RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR ARTICULATION

JOHN ARCUDI, COMMISSIONER. As clearly stated in the second paragraph of the February 16, 1993 Compensation Review Board decision to remand the matter to the First District for further proceedings, those proceedings may be either (1) a trial de novo or (2) “if the parties agree to submit the evidential transcripts and exhibits of the [trial commissioner’s] hearings together with his [the trial commissioner’s] Finding and Award and the claimant’s Motion to Correct to ... [another] Commissioner...for completion....”.

Commissioners Gerald Kolinsky and Angelo L. dos Santos concur.

 



   You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.