You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.



Gramolini v. Ford, Bacon & Davis

CASE NO. 1552 CRB-3-92-11

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

MAY 7, 1993

GARY GRAMCLINI

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

FORD, BACON & DAVIS

EMPLOYER

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

ORDER

Pursuant to the April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U. S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, U.S. , 113 S. Ct. 58O, L.Ed2d (1992) the Third District November 4, 1992 decision denying Sec. 31-284b benefits is hereby affirmed.

By the Compensation Review Board,

Jesse Frankl, Chairman

Presiding Commissioner for the Compensation Review Board Panel

 



   You have reached the original website of the
   Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission.

   Forms, publications, statutes, and most other
   information is now located at our NEW site:
   PORTAL.CT.GOV/WCC

CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS
 
ARE STILL LOCATED AT THIS SITE WHILE IN THE
PROCESS OF BEING MIGRATED TO OUR NEW SITE.

Click to read CRB OPINIONS and CRB ANNOTATIONS.