You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |
CASE NO. 1552 CRB-3-92-11
COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
MAY 7, 1993
GARY GRAMCLINI
CLAIMANT-APPELLANT
v.
FORD, BACON & DAVIS
EMPLOYER
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
Pursuant to the April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U. S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, U.S. , 113 S. Ct. 58O, L.Ed2d (1992) the Third District November 4, 1992 decision denying Sec. 31-284b benefits is hereby affirmed.
By the Compensation Review Board,
Jesse Frankl, Chairman
Presiding Commissioner for the Compensation Review Board Panel
You have reached the original website of the |
CRB OPINIONS AND ANNOTATIONS |