State of Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission, John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Home News RSS News QUICK Find Index Search E-Mail
General Information Glossary Law CRB Opinions Workers' Compensation Commission Downloadable Forms and Publications Links

Gramolini v. Ford, Bacon & Davis

CASE NO. 1552 CRB-3-92-11

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

MAY 7, 1993

GARY GRAMCLINI

CLAIMANT-APPELLANT

v.

FORD, BACON & DAVIS

EMPLOYER

RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

ORDER

Pursuant to the April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U. S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, U.S. , 113 S. Ct. 58O, L.Ed2d (1992) the Third District November 4, 1992 decision denying Sec. 31-284b benefits is hereby affirmed.

By the Compensation Review Board,

Jesse Frankl, Chairman

Presiding Commissioner for the Compensation Review Board Panel

Workers’ Compensation Commission

Page last revised: March 11, 2016

Page URL: http://wcc.state.ct.us/crb/1993/1552ord.htm

Workers’ Compensation Commission Disclaimer, Privacy Policy and Website Accessibility

State of Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission, John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Home News RSS News QUICK Find Index Search E-Mail
General Information Glossary Law CRB Opinions Workers' Compensation Commission Downloadable Forms and Publications Links