State of Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission, John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Home News RSS News QUICK Find Index Search E-Mail
General Information Glossary Law CRB Opinions Workers' Compensation Commission Downloadable Forms and Publications Links

Stanton v. Waterbury Hospital

CASE NO. 1409 CRB-5-92-4

COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

MAY 7, 1993

FRANK STANTON

CLAIMANT-APPELLEE

v.

WATERBURY HOSPITAL

EMPLOYER

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

ORDER

Pursuant t o the April 27, 1993 Connecticut Supreme Court Order, Luis v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al; Almeida v. Frito-Lay., et al ; Turcotte v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al (S.C. 14536) and the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, U.S., 113 S. Ct. 580, L.Ed2d (1992) the Fifth District April 10, 1992 award of Sec. 31-284b benefits is reversed and set aside.

By the Compensation Review Board,

Jesse Frankl, Chairman

Presiding Commissioner for the Compensation Review Board Panel

Workers’ Compensation Commission

Page last revised: March 11, 2016

Page URL: http://wcc.state.ct.us/crb/1993/1409ord.htm

Workers’ Compensation Commission Disclaimer, Privacy Policy and Website Accessibility

State of Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission, John A. Mastropietro, Chairman
Home News RSS News QUICK Find Index Search E-Mail
General Information Glossary Law CRB Opinions Workers' Compensation Commission Downloadable Forms and Publications Links